Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 SO2D 1190 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Monge v. California · Monge v. California · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 457 So. 2d 1385 - State v. Overfelt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we find a lack of logic in considering a factor to be an aggravation allowing departure from the guidelines when the same factor is included in the guidelines for purposes of furthering the goal of uniformity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Moreover, where factors are already taken into account in calculating a guidelines score, those same factors may not also be used as aggravating circumstances for a departure sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is so extraordinary or egregious as to be beyond the ordinary case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.