Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 So. 2d 186 - Williams v. State

763 So. 2d 186 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strong v. State · Cooper v. State · 729 So. 2d 232 - Henley v. State · 582 So. 2d 423 - Roberts v. State · 406 So. 2d 45 - Barry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the ordinary case . . . the original cost of the property or any special value to the owner personally is not considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 956 So. 2d 315 - Ezell v. State
  2. “the State [did not] introduce any competent evidence of the market value of the property at the time of the theft.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 910 So. 2d 60 - Thompson v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.