763 So. 2d 725 - State v. Gillet’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dorthey · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · 424 So. 2d 1009 - State v. Quebedeaux · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has stated that “an appellate court will not reverse its 14pretrial determinations ... unless the defendant presents new evidence tending to show that the decision was patently erroneous and produced an unjust result.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.