Nix v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · 587 So. 2d 848 - Holland v. State · 445 So. 2d 815 - House v. State · Sims v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our scope of review is limited to the same examination as that of the trial court in reviewing motions for [a] directed verdict and JNOV; that is, if the facts point in favor of the defendant to the extent that reasonable jurors could not have found the defendant guilty be yond a reasonable doubt, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the State, then the trial court must grant the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.