Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 SW2D 313 - State v. Claypool

State v. Claypool’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2017

7 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Clark · State v. Harris · State v. Thomson · State v. Taylor · State v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I would submit to the Court that these police reports are not being offered for truth of what they contain or for the fact that they contain hearsay items but simply so that the jury can see the inconsistencies that we have developed between the police report that was prepared on December 29th bearing Officer Brogan’s signature and the police report that was prepared on Christmas Day bearing Officer Bernard’s signature. [[Image here]] We aren’t admitting them [the police reports] to take the place of the testimony but merely so that the jury can see that there are two different reports prepared, ... by two different police officers,_ (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.