Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

763 S.W.2d 430

Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1989

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1989-01-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on Sheffield v. State · Thompson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant was convicted by a jury for manufacture of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at 50 years confinement and a $50,000.00 fine. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. Thompson v. State, 741 S.W.2d 229 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1987). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising two grounds for review.

¶3We agree with the Court of Appeals that none of the grounds raised requires reversal. As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, however, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

¶4With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

/763/sw2d/430 · .json · Public domain