Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

764 F.2d 1343

Docket No. 84-2069.

Adamson v. Ricketts

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 3, 1985.

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1989

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Adamson v. Ricketts

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., Timothy J. Foley, Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Schafer, III, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 758 F.2d 441.

/764/f2d/1343 · .json · Public domain