Warren v. Local 1759, American Federation of Government Employees’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.2d 1395 · 1985
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 7101 · 5 U.S.C. § 7111 · 5 U.S.C. § 7114 · 5 U.S.C. § 7116 · 5 U.S.C. § 7123
Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen · In re Carter · Smith v. Local No. 25, Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a labor organization which has been accorded exclusive recognition ... is responsible for representing the interests of all employees in the unit it represents without discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Congress did not intend for federal courts to have jurisdiction over such duty of fair representation claims by federal employees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.