Hurt v. Pullman Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.2d 1443 · 1985
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2012
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 403 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1386, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,320 Jessie Stevenson, Etc. v. International Paper Company, Mobile, Alabama · Johnson v. State · Herendeen v. Champion International Corp. · 437 So. 2d 76 - Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trustee who takes control of litigation involving another in order to protect the trust is not on that account bound in a subsequent action in which he appears in his individual capacity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for a party to be bound by or take advantage of a prior suit that party or its privity must not only have been present in both suits, but it has to appear in the same capacity in both suits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“have precluded him as a matter of substantive law from asserting such individual interests in the first action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.