United States v. DeCoito’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.2d 690 · 1985
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Burrell (1992), United States v. Boone (1991)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United States v. Raddatz · Geders v. United States · United States v. Soulard · United States v. Rohrer · Dallago v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bemis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.