Murphy v. Sloan’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.3d 1144 · 2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act)
Relies on Mozes v. Mozes · Gitter v. Gitter · Ruiz v. Tenorio · Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk · Robert v. Tesson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To infer abandonment of a habitual residence by acclimatization, the objective facts must point unequivocally to the child's ordinary or habitual residence being in the new country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sundberg v. Bailey“in the absence of settled parental intent, courts should be slow to infer from such contacts that an earlier habitual residence has been abandoned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sundberg v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.