Avila-Ramirez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.3d 717 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · MARIN · Department of Health & Human Services v. Florida · Judulang v. Holder · Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stating that police reports implicating respondent in criminal activity but which never resulted in prosecution due to a lack of sufficient evidence were not probative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Garland“giv[es] substantial weight to an arrest report absent a conviction or corroborating evidence of the allegations contained therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Garland“consider evidence of unfavorable conduct, including criminal conduct which has not culminated in a final conviction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.