Gensler v. Strabala’s Empirical Analysis
764 F.3d 735 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. · 134 S. Ct. 2228 - POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. · Societe Des Hotels Meridien, Meridien, S.A. v. Lasalle Hotel Operating Partnership, L.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Yet if the gist of Gensler's complaint is that big projects require big teams—-and that Gensler insists on institutional rather than personal credit—where’s the falsity?”). Strabala continues to take credit for the design of the Shanghai Tower, although the Wildpedia article does not mention him by name, noting that the building”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Strabala v. Zhang
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.