Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 F.3d 864 - Phipps Group v. Downing

Phipps Group v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis

764 F.3d 864 · 2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1407

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · McNeill v. United States · Fox v. Vice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We give substantial deference to a district court's determinations, in light of the district court's superior understanding of the litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fulfilled its responsibility of providing a concise but clear explanation of its reasons for the fee award.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he decision to award or deny attorney's fees rests within the sound discretion of the district court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.