764 F. Supp. 2d 1257 - Keithly v. Intelius Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA · Branch v. Tunnell · 105 Wash. 2d 778 - Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title Insurance · United States v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presented any evidence to contradict defendants' representations [as to webpages' authenticity] and d[id] not affirmatively identify any discrepancies between the webpages they saw and those presented by defendants with their motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provide the wire or electronic communication services utilized by its customers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“use[d] electronic communications to conduct its business on the internet”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.