Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 NE2D 268 - Ferge v. State

Ferge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jacobson v. United States · United States v. Toro · United States v. Fusko · Dockery v. State · Kats v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even in the context of undisputed police participation in criminal activity, if evidence of the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime is presented, the defendant is not entitled to an instruction on the entrapment defense unless he presents evidence showing a lack of predisposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defense that: (1) the prohibited conduct of the person was the product of a law enforcement officer, or his agent, using persuasion or other means likely to cause the person to engage in the conduct; and (2) the person was not predisposed to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the defendant shows police inducement and the State fails to show predisposition on the part of the defendant to commit the crime charged, entrapment is established as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.