Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 NE2D 295 - Pickens v. State

Pickens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foss v. Foss · In re Rivera · Joyner v. State · Hicks v. State · Timberlake v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a substantial right of the party is affected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “we will not reverse a conviction if the erroneously admitted evidence was cumulative of other evidence appropriately admitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the error is inconsistent with substantial justice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.