Huddleston v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2022
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roach v. State · Ault v. State · McBride v. State · Pritscher v. State · Vanness v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a direct and immediate result of the criminal acts of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“missed work without pay due to various pre-trial dates, trial dates, counseling appointments, and other related proceedings in relation to thle] case, the computation of [the mother]'s wages, and [the mother]'s testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. State“sufficient evidence to order restitution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.