Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 P2D 153 - Ankney v. Hall

Ankney v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2017

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

1301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodall v. Chandler Material Co. · Huey v. Stephens · Garner v. Myers · Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. Williamson · Hayward v. Ginn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held, the instruction woitld have- been error under the facts of this case. Use of the instruction ‘should be restricted to those circumstances where the evidence indicates the occurrence was caused by unforeseen circumstances or conditions and not by the negligence of either party.’ (citation omitted) ... Use of the instruction in this matter was not indicated. The roads were visibly icy during a sleet storm. In addition, USAA’s investigation and evaluation of the claim had always indicated negligence on the part of one or both parties.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “showing [of] some factor over which the parties had no control, or could not, except by the exercise of exceptional foresight, have predicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.