Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 P2D 210 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Jacobsen · American Petrofina Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23 · Wolfenbarger v. State · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct and to provide an effective remedy for unreasonable searches and seizures in violation of the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution and Article II, § 30, of the Oklahoma Constitution”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.