Jansen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2010
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Austin v. State · People v. Register · Waters v. State · Brezenoff v. State · Larson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree ... that the two prior DWI convictions were relevant to [the psychiatrist’s testimony] that there was nothing in Jansen’s history ... which would support a finding of recMessness. By putting Jansen’s mens rea directly in issue ... Jansen opened [the door] to cross-examination about the basis for [the psychiatrist’s] opinion[.] [[Image here]] By offering this evidence, Jansen opened the door for the state to impeach [Jansen’s expert] by showing that he had either overlooked or disregarded significant evidence of past recMessness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nelson v. State“A drunk driver presents a universal risk to the community at large....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Greenwood v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.