Horton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2011
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Hullum v. United States · Bourjaily v. United States · Gibson v. United States · Gullett v. States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. The nature of the startling event; “2. The declarant’s physical manifestation of excitement; “31 The declarant’s age; “4. The lapse of time between the event and the hearsay statement; and “5. Whether the statement was made in response to an inquiry.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. James v. State · Oldman v. State“declarant's condition at the time was such that the statement was spontaneous, excited or impulsive rather than the product of reflection and deliberation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. James v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.