State v. Mortimore

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Matthew MORTIMORE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1988

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1988-11-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1989

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Kidd · State v. Mortimore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-11-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

B71-526; CA A47988.

¶1Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted August 24, 1988. Decided November 23, 1988.

¶2Charles M. Gudger, III, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

¶3Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

¶4Before WARDEN, P.J., and GRABER, J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Pro Tem.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Defendant raises objections to conditions of probation imposed by the trial court. Assuming that those conditions are reviewable, in the trial court, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Kidd, 61 Or. App. 292, 656 P.2d 391 (1983).

¶7AFFIRMED.