764 So. 2d 1055 - Winch v. Double M, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America · 720 So. 2d 785 - Davison v. Horseshoe Casino, Inc. · 651 So. 2d 494 - Johnson v. NATCO
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The workers' compensation judge erred by admitting into evidence at the default judgment confirmation hearing uncertified and unsworn record of Dr. Luiz C. DeAraujo. 2. The workers' compensation judge erred in finding that plaintiff suffered an injury while in the course and scope of his employment at the Petroleum Club of Lafayette. 3. The workers' compensation judge erred in awarding weekly benefits for total disability. 4. The workers' compensation judge erred in awarding the plaintiff medical benefits or in the alternative, erred in the amount of medical benefits awarded. 5. The workers' compensation judge erred in ordering the employer to pay penalties and attorney fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“but was unable to definitively identify Doumite's problem or treat her pain effectively. [1] In Winch v. Double M, Inc., 99-1793 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/5/00) , 764 So.2d 1055 , writ denied, 00-1271 (La.6/16/00), 765 So.2d 339 , this court has stated: As a general rule, the testimony of a treating physician should be given more weight than that of a physician who examined a claimant for diagnostic purposes. Johnson [v. NATCO, 94-1236 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/95) ], 651 So.2d 494 . Furthermore,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As a general rule, the testimony of a treating physician should be given more weight than that of a physician who examined a claimant for diagnostic purposes. Johnson [v. NATCO, 94-1236 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/95) ], 651 So.2d 494 . Furthermore, "the positive findings of medical experts are to be afforded greater weight than negative findings as to the existence or not of a particular condition."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.