Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 SO2D 1079 - Menson v. Taylor

Menson v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alvarado v. Doe · 594 So. 2d 963 - Keathley v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. · Abney v. Exxon Corp. · 741 So. 2d 171 - Watkins v. International Service Systems · Watkins v. International Service Systems

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Characterized by, or involving, malice; having, or done with, wicked or mischievous intentions or motives; wrongful and done intentionally without just cause or excuse. See also Malice; Willful.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There are two exceptions to this rule. The first is for injuries occasioned by the intentional act of the fellow employee. The second exception involves injuries that occur outside the course and scope of the employment. Thus, although La. R.S. 23:1032 provides for tort immunity to a co-employee of an injured employee, an employee may seek tort recovery from a co-employee who willfully caused the employee's injuries, or who was not engaged in the normal course and scope of his employment at the time of the injury. [Citations omitted] The course of employment test refers to time and place, while the scope of employment test examines the employment related risk of injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a. bodily injury or property damage: (1) which is either expected or intended by an insured; or (2) to any person or property which is the result of willful and malicious acts of an insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.