State v. Hutchinson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State · 367 So. 2d 283 - State Ex Rel. Bickman v. Dees · 423 So. 2d 1053 - State v. Robinson · State v. Woods
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the provisions of article 895 H were not in effect at the time of the commission of defendant's crime, their application to defendant would be [a] ... violation of the ex post facto provisions in the U.S. and Louisiana Constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“application ... of the notice provisions of LA.CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 895(H) does not violate the ex post facto prohibitions of the United States and Louisiana Constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“); State v. Babin, 93-1361 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/20/94) , 637 So.2d 814, 824 (holding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.