764 So. 2d 22 - Williamson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 684 So. 2d 736 - Chicone v. State · State v. Medlin · 679 So. 2d 1216 - Hansman v. State · 707 So. 2d 771 - Oliver v. State · 728 So. 2d 1189 - Lambert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At trial, Shirline Smith testified that she owned a house which she had rented to Henry Klamm and Bruce Dill. The House had caught fire about five days prior to the incident and was boarded up. Klamm and Dill no longer lived there, and they did not testify at trial. Smith testified that a small refrigerator in Klamm's room belonged to her. On April 25, 1997, the police called Smith to the house. A small refrigerator was in the backyard, and the back door had been broken open. Smith testified that she did not give Williamson permission to go into the house and take anything from it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson“DOES CHICONE V. STATE, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla.1996), RECEDE FROM STATE V. MEDLIN, 273 So.2d 394 (1973)(INDICATING THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE GUILTY KNOWLEDGE IN CONSTRUCTIVE POSSESSION BUT NOT ACTUAL POSSESSION CASES)? DOES CHICONE APPLY WHEN THE DEFENSE PRESENTS NO EVIDENCE? DOES CHICONE CREATE A NEW ELEMENT TO THE CRIME OF POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.