764 So. 2d 496 - Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 381 So. 2d 983 - Jones v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is competent to be a juror if the juror has no interest, bias or prejudice in the prosecution, and the juror has no desire to reach a result other than that gained from the evidence and the law in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The right to a fair trial by an impartial jury is fundamental and essential to our form of government. It is a right guaranteed by the both the state and federal constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny juror shall be excluded . . . if the court be of the opinion that he cannot try the case impartially, and the exclusion shall not be assignable for error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.