Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 So. 2d 574 - State v. McKnight

764 So. 2d 574 - State v. McKnight’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 760 So. 2d 114 - Leonard v. State · 708 So. 2d 617 - Maddox v. State · 759 So. 2d 686 - McKnight v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rejecting State's argument that a fundamental sentencing error should remain uncorrected simply because the erroneous sentence is to be served concurrently with other sentences that are not being challenged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.