¶1Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 915 (Fla.1999); State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding no constitutional right to enforce plea bargain); Winokur v. State, 605 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to a plea bargain); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[I]f sentence is within the limits prescribed by the Legislature, we have no jurisdiction to interfere.”) (quoting Banks v. State, 342 So.2d 469, 470 (Fla.1976)).
764 So. 2d 612
Thompson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 29, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-09-29
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2004
2 state decisions
Relies on Knight v. State · Barfield v. State · 342 So. 2d 469 - Banks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-09-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →