¶1We treat this as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Doss v. Florida Department of Corrections, 730 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), seeking review of the circuit court’s denial of appellanVpetitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus. We deny the petition, finding no denial of due process and no departure from the essential requirements of the law in the circuit court’s determination that the mandamus petition was untimely. See F.a. R.App. P. 9.100(c). This denial is without prejudice to petitioner asking the Secretary of the Department of Corrections to vacate and re-issue the challenged decision from which petitioner may then timely appeal. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
764 So. 2d 619
Dorsey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 19, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-01-19
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2002
3 state decisions
Relies on Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp. · Calvert v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-01-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →