Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

764 So. 2d 769

Bateman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-07-12

Relies on 535 So. 2d 642 - Gust v. State · Waters v. State

Decided 2000-07-12

PER CURIAM.

¶1This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion on the ground that it was untimely filed. Appellant’s motion was properly filed within two years of the time that Appellant’s judgment and sentence became final. See Borghese v. State, 694 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(citing Gust v. State, 535 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for reconsideration of Appellant’s motion.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.
/764/so2d/769 · .json · Public domain