Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

764 So. 2d 883

Freeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-08-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2018

3 state decisions

Relies on Watts v. State · Glendon v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the Defendant’s probation and affirm. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking the Defendant’s probation and setting forth the conditions that it found were violated, we remand solely for the purpose of entering such an order. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1018-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Glendon v. State, 669 So.2d 1148, 1148-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/764/so2d/883 · .json · Public domain