¶1specially concurring.
¶2I agree with the viewpoint expressed by Judge Joanos in his dissent in O’Neal v. State, 501 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Based on existing precedent, however, I am required to concur.
764 So. 2d 908
Marshall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 14, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-08-14
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2014
3 state decisions
Relies on 501 So. 2d 98 - O'NEAL v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-08-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →