Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 764 SW2D 353 - Beverly v. State

Beverly v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Chimel v. California · Gray v. Lucas, Warden, Et Al. · Beardsley v. State · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a warrantless arrest pursuant to article 14.01, [to be valid] however, probable cause for arrest must arise from facts within the arresting officer's own knowledge and observations, not from hearsay information. (My emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.