Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 A.2d 363 - Com. v. GP

Com. v. GP’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Estelle v. Smith · Michigan v. Jackson · In Re B. · Commonwealth v. Nester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No psychiatrist or person who has been licensed under the act of March 23, 1972 (P.L. 136, No. 52), to practice psychology shall be, without the written consent of his client, examined in any civil or criminal matter as to any information acquired in the course of his professional services in behalf of such client. The confidential relations and communications between a psychologist or psychiatrist and his client shall be on the same basis as those provided or prescribed by law between an attorney and client.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.