Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 1047 - Schuster v. United States

Schuster v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 1047 · 1985

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Pole No. 3172 (1988), United States v. Eng (1991)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

22019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6851

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · Molinaro v. New Jersey · Cochran v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■ [W]here the appeal is based on procedural error — i.e., that the district court acted outside its authority, rather than acting erroneously within its authority — this court will review the decision to determine whether such error occurred. The exception applies here, where [the plaintiff] is appealing the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ny determination made by a court under this section shall be final and conclusive and shall not be reviewed by any other court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no question that the civil case here at issue ... is related to the criminal case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.