International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
765 F.2d 175 · 1985
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service (1993), Leed Architectural Products, Inc. v. United Steelworkers, Local 6674 (1990)
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co. · Rodriquez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purports to close out bargaining during the contract term and to make the written contract the exclusive statement of the parties' rights and obligations.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“During the term of a contract ... the scope of the duty to bargain over a particular mandatory subject depends upon whether that subject is 'contained in' the contract.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine the operations or services to be performed in or at the plant or by the employees of the Company, to establish and maintain production and quality standards, to schedule the working hours, to hire, promote, demote, and transfer, to suspend, discipline or discharge for just cause or to relieve employees because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons, to introduce new and improved methods, materials or facilities, or to change existing methods, materials or facilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.