Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 49 - Ld Jameson v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Ld Jameson v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Subsidiary Companies’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 49 · 1985

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2014

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 1053 (§ 203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Bishop v. Wood · Hewitt v. Helms · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ERISA's substantive provisions are not to be used to determine the law at the time of incidents occurring before January 1, 1975.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.