Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 494 - Davis v. Veslan Enterprises

Davis v. Veslan Enterprises’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 494 · 1985

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
6
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc. (1988), Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles (1986)

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

6401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Elliott v. Perez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the attorney has conducted a reasonable inquiry into the facts which support the document; (2) that the attorney has conducted a reasonable inquiry into the law such that the document embodies existing legal principles or a good faith argument “for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law;” and (3) that the motion is not interposed for purposes of delay, harassment, or increasing costs of litigation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he court ... retains the necessary flexibility to deal appropriately with violations of the rule. It has discretion to tailor sanctions to the particular facts of the case, with which it should be well acquainted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is more stringent than the original good-faith formula and thus ... a greater range of circumstances will trigger its violation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.