Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 504 - Norman v. Ol McCotter

Norman v. Ol McCotter’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 504 · 1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Alexander v. McCotter (1985), Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit (1994)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Howard v. United States · Galindo v. Precision American Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that they are not inconsistent with these rules, may be applied, where appropriate, to petitions filed under these rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “on the basis of the non-pleading factual showing of one party, without notice to the other and an opportunity by him to respond by controverting factual showing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “after the answer and the transcript and record of state court proceedings are filed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.