Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 511 - Rose v. Batson

Rose v. Batson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
5
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc. (2000), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Conner (1994)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 36 state decisions

23019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Hall v. Cole · Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Dismissal is proper only in situations where the deterrent value of Rule 37 cannot be substantially achieved by the use of less drastic sanctions. "”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rule 37(b)(2)(C) authorizes dismissal with prejudice when a party refuses to obey a discovery order. Batson. Because of the severity of this sanction, dismissal with prejudice typically is appropriate only if the refusal to comply results from willfulness or bad faith and is accompanied by a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hile we leave the determination of reasonable attorney's fees and expenses to the sound discretion of the district court, the court must articulate reasons for its assessment so that, if appealed, we may have a basis to review the court's action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.