Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 655 - Sestric v. Clark

Sestric v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 655 · 1985

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2009

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

100198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shapiro v. Thompson · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Bates v. State Bar of Arizona · Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM · Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a matter of conjecture whether the requirement of taking and passing a bar exam would actually exclude many lawyers having a serious desire”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although there might seem to be no greater assurance regarding lawyers who move to [Wyoming] and are admitted without having to take a bar exam, they at least are making a greater commitment to the state. By becoming residents of [Wyoming] they place themselves in a situation where in all likelihood the bulk of their clients will be [Wyoming] clients; the bulk of the law they practice will be [Wyoming] law; and they will learn through doing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because Illinois has not barred nonresidents from practicing law, has not discriminated against residents in gross, and may not even have imposed a net burden on nonresidents compared to the small class of favored residents, Sectric has failed to make out a prima facie case under the privileges and immunities clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.