United States v. Reda’s Empirical Analysis
765 F.2d 715 · 1985
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Jones (1989)
47 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Barrett v. United States · Lombard v. Marcera · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · United States v. James · Bibby v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a] district court has wide discretion in formulating appropriate jury instructions. A defendant is not entitled to a particularly worded instruction where the instructions given, when viewed as a whole, adequately and correctly cover the substance of the requested instruction.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A district court has wide discretion in formulating appropriate jury instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.