Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 784 - United States v. Claiborne

United States v. Claiborne’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 784 · 1985

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
5
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), United States v. Yarbrough (1988)

71 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

5801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 26 U.S.C. § 6103 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “circumstantial evidence indicating that defendant knew or must have known that his returns were false.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] defendant may rebut the Government's proof of willfulness by establishing good faith reliance on a qualified accountant after full disclosure of tax related information.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “written statement made by said witness and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by him.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.