Franklin v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
765 F.2d 82 · 1985
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 234 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Hodges (2009), Franklin v. Rose (1987)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Wainwright v. Sykes · Blackledge v. Allison · Frey v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). This general principle often requires a searching examination of the petition. As the Sixth Circuit noted in Franklin: 5 The appropriate liberal construction requires active interpretation in some cases to construe a pro se petition”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“allegations of a pro se habeas petition, though vague and conclusory, are entitled to a liberal construction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to encompass any allegation stating federal relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.