Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.3d 1183 - Thomas v. Kaven

Thomas v. Kaven’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.3d 1183 · 2014

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Imbler v. Pachtman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A right is clearly established in this circuit when a Supreme Court or Tenth Circuit decision is on point, or if the clearly established weight of authority from other courts shows that the right must be as the plaintiff maintains.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At the motion-to-dismiss stage, we must accept all the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint as true and must construe them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'the defendant's [alleged conduct] violated a constitutional or statutory right'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.