Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.3d 601 - Kiser v. Reitz

Kiser v. Reitz’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.3d 601 · 2014

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Elrod v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an intention to engage in a course of conduct arguably affected with a constitutional interest, but proscribed by a statute, and there exists a credible threat of prosecution thereunder.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prudential ripeness” (citation and quotation marks omitted)). But see Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1377, 1386 , 188 L.Ed.2d 392 (2014) (“[A] federal court’s obligation to hear and decide cases within its jurisdiction is virtually unflagging.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]n allegation of future injury may suffice if the threatened injury is certainly impending, or there is a substantial risk that the harm will occur.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.