Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.3d 702 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.3d 702 · 2014

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3672 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. Wyatt · United States v. Bonanno · United States v. Siegel · United States v. Alburay · United States v. Adkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any new conditions imposed in the later written judgment are inconsistent with the court's oral order and must be vacated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did not include any statement as to whether other standard conditions would apply,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unambiguously announced several specific conditions of supervised release”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.