Barnes v. Hammer’s Empirical Analysis
765 F.3d 810 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cullen v. Pinholster · Cullen v. Pinholster · Lafler v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“habeas relief can be available if the conviction at issue is based on findings of fact that could not reasonably be derived from the state court evidentiary record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ervin v. Bowersox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.